orphiverniq Logo orphiverniq
Industry Certified Since 2018

Real Stories from Financial Modellers

We've worked with analysts across Australia who needed to sharpen their financial modelling skills. Some were fresh graduates trying to land their first role. Others were mid-career professionals wanting to move into more technical positions.

What they share is honest feedback about what worked, what challenged them, and how the skills they learned actually showed up in their day-to-day work. Not every outcome looks the same—because everyone starts from a different place and has different goals.

These reviews come from people who completed our programs between mid-2024 and early 2025. They're unedited, and they reflect genuine experiences—both the wins and the struggles.

Financial modelling workshop session with participants reviewing spreadsheet models Analyst working on complex financial model in collaborative environment

What Past Participants Say

These are direct reflections from people who've gone through our programs. Results and experiences vary based on prior knowledge and effort invested.

"I came in with basic Excel knowledge and left with models I could actually use at work. The course pushed me harder than I expected—especially the discounted cash flow sections. But I needed that push. Three months after finishing, I moved into a junior analyst role where modelling is part of my weekly routine."

L

Lachlan Pemberton

Junior Financial Analyst, Sydney

Completed: August 2024

"I'd been doing financial planning for years but always felt limited when clients asked technical questions about valuations or scenario planning. The program filled gaps I didn't even know I had. It's not a quick fix—I spent evenings and weekends on it for months. But now I can build models that give clients clearer answers."

S

Siobhan Flannery

Financial Planner, Brisbane

Completed: November 2024

"The feedback on my models was brutal in the best way. Instructors didn't just mark things right or wrong—they explained why certain approaches cause problems down the line. I rewrote my capstone project twice before it passed. Frustrating? Yes. Worth it? Absolutely. I use those principles every time I open a spreadsheet now."

D

Declan Ashworth

Investment Analyst, Melbourne

Completed: January 2025

"I took this while still finishing my commerce degree. It was tough balancing both, but the practical side made everything from my university classes click into place. When I interviewed for graduate roles, I could talk through actual models I'd built instead of just theory. That made a real difference."

A

Aoife Breslin

Graduate Analyst, Perth

Completed: September 2024

"The sensitivity analysis module changed how I approach client reporting. Before, I'd present one forecast. Now I show ranges and help clients understand what assumptions actually drive outcomes. It's made conversations more productive and reduced second-guessing later on."

R

Rory Kavanaugh

Business Advisor, Adelaide

Completed: December 2024

"Not going to lie—I almost quit during week four. The pace was intense and I felt behind. But the support forums and instructor feedback kept me going. By the end, I'd built models that were better than anything I'd seen in my first two years of work. That confidence shift was everything."

M

Maeve Doherty

Corporate Finance Associate, Canberra

Completed: October 2024

How Participants Rate Key Areas

We survey everyone who completes our programs. This table shows average ratings across six areas that matter most for practical financial modelling work. Scores reflect feedback from 87 participants between June 2024 and January 2025.

These aren't promotional claims—they're aggregated ratings from post-program surveys. Some areas score higher than others, and that feedback helps us improve continuously.

Financial analyst reviewing detailed spreadsheet model with multiple scenarios and assumptions
Program Element Average Rating Most Common Feedback
Technical Depth 4.6/5.0 Covers real-world complexity
Practical Application 4.7/5.0 Models used immediately at work
Instructor Feedback 4.5/5.0 Detailed, specific, actionable
Pacing Challenge 4.2/5.0 Demanding but manageable
Resource Quality 4.6/5.0 Templates remain useful long-term
Career Relevance 4.4/5.0 Aligned with job requirements

Ready to Build Your Own Experience?

Our next intake begins in July 2026. Programs run for 12-16 weeks depending on the track you choose. You'll need to commit 8-12 hours weekly for coursework, practice models, and feedback reviews.

This isn't a shortcut—it's structured learning that requires genuine effort. But if you're willing to put in the work, you'll develop capabilities that change how you approach financial analysis.

Detailed feedback on every model you submit

Access to instructor office hours throughout the program

Portfolio of real models you can reference in interviews

Peer discussion forums with working analysts and graduates

Professional working on advanced financial models with multiple data sources and valuation techniques